A Teaching of the Assembly
A Night Nobody Questions
Once a year, as October closes, the streets fill with small ghosts. Children in the dress of witches, skeletons, corpses, and demons go laughing from door to door — others as heroes and favorite characters — and their parents laugh with them, and the whole neighborhood agrees: it is harmless. It is candy. It is fun. It is tradition.
Almost nobody asks the question that matters: where did this night come from?
Why this date? Why the costumes of the dead? Why the lantern with a face carved into it, glowing on the porch? And why does a night devoted to death and spirits carry a name built out of the word for saints?
Those are not small questions, and this night does not survive them. Walk with us through the history — honestly, the way this Assembly weighs every voice, including its own — and then weigh the night on the only scale that has ever mattered: the Scriptures.
The Old Night: Samhain
One deep root of Halloween reaches back to Samhain — commonly pronounced sow-in — a festival associated especially with Gaelic Ireland and the seasonal turn into winter. Samhain is described in early medieval Irish sources and is understood to have older roots, although the details of pre-Christian observance are not fully documented. It fell at the turn of the year, around what our calendar calls November 1, and it marked two endings at once: the end of the harvest, and the beginning of the dark half of the year, when the herds came down from the pastures and the long nights began.
Later Irish and Scottish folklore strongly associated this season with the Otherworld, with spirits, and with the aos sí — beings connected with the ancient mounds. Tales describe uncanny encounters; seasonal practices came to include fires and customs meant to deal with the unseen. The often-repeated claim that every ancient Celt believed a literal veil between the living and the dead grew thin that night goes beyond what the surviving early evidence can establish — we say so plainly. But the association of this season with the dead and the spirit world is real, and it is old.
Hear this plainly: Samhain was not a harvest party with spooky decorations. It was a turning point of the year at which a people's attention — their stories, their fears, their customs — turned toward the dead and the unseen. That is the root. Everything else in this teaching grows out of it, so do not let it go: the night began as a doorway to the dead.
Masks and Soul Cakes
Two later customs helped shape what now walks our streets, and both of them are still with us — we have only forgotten their names.
The first is guising. In Scotland and Ireland, records from the early modern period describe people going from house to house in disguise at this season, sometimes performing songs or recitations in exchange for food or gifts. Later explanations sometimes connect the disguises with avoiding or confusing the spirits abroad that night. That is one strand of folklore, not a proven explanation for every costume — but the logic it preserves is the season's own logic: on the night the dead walk, dress like the dead.
The second is souling, and it is the better documented of the two. In parts of medieval and later Christian Europe, especially England, the poor — and in some places children — went from house to house around All Hallows and All Souls, sometimes promising prayers for the departed of the household in exchange for soul cakes or other food. Prayers for your dead, in trade for food. Souling is not the single origin of trick-or-treat — modern Halloween gathered several traditions across centuries, including new customs in North America — but it is one of its direct ancestors: the child at your door tonight, holding out a bag.
Costumes of the dead. Door to door. Food given in the season of the departed. The modern world did not invent a new holiday. It inherited an old one and stopped asking what it meant.
Renamed, Not Removed
So how did a season of the dead end up wearing the names of saints?
In the year 601, Pope Gregory the Great sent instructions to the missionary Mellitus concerning England — preserved later by the historian Bede — and gave a policy that would shape centuries. Do not, he counseled, destroy the well-built temples of the pagans: remove the idols, consecrate the places, and use them for Christian worship. And do not abolish the people's sacrificial feasts outright; replace them with religious feasting tied to church dedications and the martyrs. The thinking was plain: a people will surrender a building and a calendar more easily than they will surrender a custom — so keep the custom, and change its name.
We say this honestly, because this Assembly does not build teachings on sand: Gregory's letter speaks of England's temples and sacrifices in general. It does not mention Samhain, Halloween, October 31, or November 1, and it does not establish why those feast dates were chosen. What it documents is an approach — adaptation over removal — and that approach is a matter of record.
Then watch the calendar. In 609 or 610, Pope Boniface IV dedicated Rome's Pantheon to Mary and all martyrs — an occasion commemorated on May 13. In the eighth century, Pope Gregory III dedicated an oratory at St. Peter's to all saints, associated with November 1; and in 835, under Emperor Louis the Pious and with the involvement of Pope Gregory IV, that November observance was promoted across the Frankish Empire. November 2, All Souls' Day, developed as a commemoration of the departed and was spread further through the influence of Cluny under Abbot Odilo in the eleventh century.
And so October 31 became the evening before All Saints' Day: All Hallows' Eve — hallow being an older word for a saint — worn down over the centuries into the word we use today: Halloween.
Is it proven, in surviving documents, that November 1 was chosen in order to replace Samhain? It is not, and we will not pretend otherwise — historians debate the relationship. What is not debated is the fit: the feast of the saints placed on the morning after the old night of the dead, prayers for the dead on the day after that, and the season's customs — the masks, the door-to-door, the food for souls — carried through under the new names. The night was never removed. It was covered. And a covered thing does not stop being what it is underneath.
Even the lantern confesses it. In Ireland and Scotland they carved turnips and other root vegetables — hollowed, faced, lit from within. The folk tale told of them is the tale of Stingy Jack, condemned to wander with a light after trying to outwit the devil — folklore, and we label it as such, not a record of ancient worship. But folklore tells you what a people believed their customs meant, and the stories that clung to the lantern were of wandering souls and fear of the unseen. In America, where pumpkins were abundant and easier to carve, the turnip gave way to the pumpkin, and the face got friendlier. The face is the only part that changed.
What the Scriptures Say
History can tell us where the night came from. Only Scripture can tell us what to do with it. Scripture does not name Halloween — it names the pattern, and it speaks to that pattern with a precision that should make every believer sit up, because Yahuah addressed it thousands of years before Samhain had a name.
First, the covering itself is the sin He named.
“Guard yourself that you are not ensnared to follow them, after they are destroyed from before you, and that you do not inquire about their mighty ones, saying, 'How did these nations serve their mighty ones? And let me do so too, I also.' You do not do so to Yahuah your Elohim, for every abomination of Yahuah which He hates they have done to their mighty ones.”
Debarim (Deuteronomy) 12:30–31
Read what is forbidden. Not merely idolatry in the open — but the inquiry: How did these nations serve their gods? Let me do the same, only toward mine. That is Gregory's policy read from heaven's side of the page. Where a practice involves the worship of other powers or the imitation of forbidden rites, changing its dedication does not make that worship acceptable. The practice is borrowed, the name is changed, and Yahuah calls the borrowed practice what it was at its root: the abominations He hates were done in those practices, and a new dedication does not wash an old root.
Second, the night's subject matter is named and forbidden outright.
“Let no one be found among you who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practises divination, or a user of magic, or one who interprets omens or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For whoever does these is an abomination to Yahuah.”
Debarim (Deuteronomy) 18:10–12
The dead. Divination. Sorcery. The spirit world, consulted and courted. Hear the honesty too, because this Assembly will not overclaim its own text: a costume is not, by itself, an act of divination, and Scripture does not equate every child in a ghost costume with a medium. But the command condemns the practices themselves, by name — and this night, ancient and modern, is dressed in exactly those images: the witch, the medium, the corpse, the spirit. Yahuah does not call them play. He calls them abomination, and He does not add, unless they are done in fun.
Third — and this Assembly will feel this one — there are two tables, and no one sits at both.
“You are not able to drink the cup of Yahuah and the cup of demons. You are not able to partake of the table of Yahuah and of the table of demons.”
Qorintiyim (1 Corinthians) 10:21
We have taught here what Yahuah called food, and the table He set for His people. There is another table. In its own context, Sha'ul (Paul) is speaking of participation in idol sacrifices — the fellowship such worship expresses. A bag of Halloween candy is not automatically an idol sacrifice, and we will not pretend this verse says it is. But the principle Sha'ul (Paul) lays down allows no third option and no blending: allegiance is not shared between two tables. A family must know which table its children are eating from.
And the rest of the witness agrees, voice after voice:
“And have no fellowship with the fruitless works of darkness, but rather also reprove them.”
Eph'siyim (Ephesians) 5:11
“Do not become unevenly yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness? And what fellowship has light with darkness?”
Qorintiyim (2 Corinthians) 6:14
“Therefore, 'Come out from among them and be separate, says Yahuah, and do not touch the unclean. And I shall receive you.'”
Qorintiyim (2 Corinthians) 6:17
“Keep back from every form of wickedness.”
Thessaloniqim (1 Thessalonians) 5:22
“And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.”
Romiyim (Romans) 12:2
No fellowship. Come out. Be separate. Abstain from every form. Do not be conformed. The Scriptures do not stutter on this night. We stutter — because the night is woven into our childhoods, our neighborhoods, our children's friendships, and coming out of it costs something. But cost has never amended a command.
The Pattern Beneath It All
Now step back, and see this night the way this Assembly has learned to see.
We have taught here of the Name — how Yahuah gave His Name as a memorial for all generations, and how men covered that Name with a title until, in Yirmeyahu's (Jeremiah's) words, the fathers forgot His Name for Baal. They did not burn the Scriptures. They did not close the places of worship. They simply laid a cover over the true thing, generation by generation, until the people underneath the cover could no longer remember what had been hidden from them.
What was done to the Name was done to this night — in reverse, and by the same method. The Name was covered to make men forget Yahuah. The night was covered to make men forget the night. Lay saints across the top of the old season of the dead, and within a few generations no one asks why the children dress as the dead on the eve of the saints. The covering is the forgetting. It worked in Yirmeyahu's (Jeremiah's) day, and it has worked in ours.
That is an analogy, not a documented chain of events — and a teaching that does not fear the scale does not need it to be more. But a covered well is not a clean well. A renamed festival is not a redeemed one. And Yahuah's way with darkness has never once been to drape it in better cloth and keep it in the house. His way, from Debarim (Deuteronomy) to the last letter, is the same word He spoke over this night three thousand years early: come out.
"But It's Just Candy"
Someone reading this is already saying it — perhaps with love, perhaps with a child tugging at a sleeve: We don't worship anything. We don't believe in spirits. It's just candy, just dressing up, just fun. Our hearts are toward Yahuah, and He knows it.
Hear the answer gently, because it is given gently: Debarim (Deuteronomy) 12 does not ask about the participant's heart. It asks about the practice's root. The Israelite who inquired how the nations served their gods did not intend to leave Yahuah — he intended to worship Yahuah in their way, and that intention did not save the practice. Yahuah judged the thing by where it came from, not by how it felt. Our feelings about a night cannot change what the night is, any more than a sincere man renaming Baal could make the Name unnecessary. Good intentions do not make forbidden worship permissible — and neither does a claim about ancient origins, by itself, settle every modern custom. Debarim (Deuteronomy) 12 is not a ban on everything born outside Israel; it is a ban on borrowing the worship of other mighty ones and calling the borrowed thing holy. That is the test, and this night must face it like everything else.
And there are the children. A child learns what a household celebrates long before he can explain what it believes. Not every costume depicts death, and not every family means to honor darkness — still, parents teach through what they applaud, repeat, and make part of family life. When we dress our children as the dead and send them out laughing into the season the ancient world set apart for spirits, we are teaching — with costumes and candy and our own smiling approval — that death and darkness are toys. The lessons taught through joy can remain for years. Choose carefully which joys teach your house.
This does not mean a believer's home must sit dark and grim while the street laughs, and it does not mean inventing a replacement feast and calling it commanded. It means the home of Yahuah can be full that night without borrowing this one: a family at its own table, good food Yahuah called food, Scripture open, prayer over the household, a porch light of a different kind — generosity and kindness to the neighbors who pass, without joining their procession. Joy was never Halloween's to lend. It was ours first.
The Invitation
So the invitation stands, the same one that stands over every covered thing in this Assembly's teaching:
Come out from the night that was covered, the way your fathers are called to come back to the Name that was covered. Keep your table Yahuah's table. Let your children learn, from the way your house keeps its evenings, that some doors are not opened — not even in costume, not even for candy, not even once a year.
The saints whose name this night borrowed are not honored by the borrowing; they are honored by separation, by holiness, by a people who would rather stand apart from the world's favorite night than sit at a table that is not their Master's.
The night will come again next October, as it has for centuries. The question was never whether the night would come. The question is whose house it finds you in.
Come out — and be separate.
praiseyahuah.org